Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Signal, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Signal, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol 13, 257-264, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

The politics of health promotion: insights from political theory

L Signal
Public Health Group, Ministry of Health, PO Box 5013, Wellington, New Zealand

Health promotion is inherently political. Not only is it largely funded by government, but the very nature of the enterprise requires shifts in power. Political theory has much to contribute to an understanding of the politics of health promotion. In this paper three key political theories are explained and their insights for health promotion explored. They are then applied to the development of a National Drug Policy in New Zealand. The theories - pluralist interest group theory, the new institutionalism and neo-Marxist theory - are each at a different level of analysis. The significance of interests, institutional factors and class as political influences on health promotion are discussed. It is concluded that to ensure good practice health promotion practitioners need to be aware of these influences on their work. They need to strategise to ensure support from key interests, build capacity for health promotion into their institutions and recognise the macro-political context within which they work in order to influence it.Keywords: drug policy; health promotion; new public health; political theory
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
L. N. Mannheimer, J. Lehto, and P. Ostlin
Window of opportunity for intersectoral health policy in Sweden open, half-open or half-shut?
Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2007; 22(4): 307 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J Public HealthHome page
L.N. Mannheimer, G. Gulis, J. Lehto, and P. Ostlin
Introducing Health Impact Assessment: an analysis of political and administrative intersectoral working methods
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2007; 17(5): 526 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
C. Bambra, D. Fox, and A. Scott-Samuel
Towards a politics of health
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2005; 20(2): 187 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.