Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McWilliam, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Galajda, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McWilliam, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Galajda, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 14, No. 1, 27-41, March 1999
© Oxford University Press 1999

Home-based health promotion for chronically ill older persons: results of a randomized controlled trial of a critical reflection approach

Carol L. McWilliam, Moira Stewart, Judith Belle Brown, Susan McNair, Allan Donner, Kathryn Desai, Patricia Coderre and Joanne Galajda

Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Kresge Building, Room K1, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C1

Address for correspondence: Dr Carol L McWilliam, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Addition, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1

The purpose of this study was to test a health promotion intervention for people over 65 years of age discharged from hospital to care at home for chronic medical conditions. Researchers hypothesized that chronically ill older people who received the intervention would have a significantly more positive mindset (or attitude toward their life, self, health, and health care), would use significantly less hospital and home care services, and would have a significantly better quality of life. At the time of discharge from hospital, 298 seniors were randomized to receive the usual home care plus the intervention, or to an attention control group receiving the usual home care. The intervention was comprised of approximately 10 weekly hour-long sessions in which a nurse facilitated critical reflection on life and health. Data collected by personal interview at baseline, 22 weeks, and 1 year later were analyzed using ANOVA and logistic regression, controlling for age, gender, living arrangements, accommodation, number of chronic medical problems and baseline differences, as appropriate. Results: Those who received the intervention had significantly greater independence (p = 0.008) and perceived ability to manage their own health (p = 0.014) and significantly less desire for information (p = 0.021) immediately post-intervention. At the 1-year follow-up, the pattern persisted, although significant differences were limited to independence (p = 0.007) and desire for information (p = 0.035). As well, at 1-year the intervention group had higher yet more significantly declined self-care agency (p = 0.025) and locus of authority (p = 0.017). Comparison of changes in health resource utilization by the two groups did not differ significantly. However, the intervention group had a significantly greater (p = 0.006) chance of having higher quality of life immediately post-intervention. This trend persisted at 1 year, although differences were non-significant. Results suggest the clinical potential of critical reflection to enhance the health of chronically ill older persons. Further investigation with less frail populations is needed.

Key words: critical reflection; health care for chronic illness; health promotion; perspective transformation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.