Health Promotion International, Vol. 14, No. 1, 83-91,
March 1999
© Oxford University Press 1999
Continuous quality improvement and health promotion: can CQI lead to better outcomes?
1 Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, Canada and 2 Kael Consulting, Regina, Canada
Address for correspondence: Barbara Kahan, Kael Consulting, 2058 Elphinstone Street, Regina SK, Canada S4T 3N4
Canadian health promotion organizations currently face two pressures. First, is the desire of health promotion organizations to seek methods which will help achieve health promotion goals. Second, external funders are increasingly likely to require that health promotion organizations adopt ‘quality’ procedures, such as Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI). This paper explores a set of questions that assess the potential benefits of CQI with respect to health promotion organizations. These questions include: Is the philosophy of CQI compatible with health promotion principles, values and beliefs? Is CQI methodology and approach applicable to health promotion? If there are no irresolvable conflicts between CQI and health promotion, will implementing CQI processes improve health promotion practice? In addition, the paper highlights several issues that health promotion needs to address before adopting CQI, including: the meaning and relevance of concepts such as ‘customer’ and ‘customer satisfaction’, within the context of health promotion; and the heavy emphasis that CQI places on data that are measurable and quantifiable. While further exploration and documentation are required before definitive resolution of these issues, a preliminary overview indicates that CQI, with some modifications, is compatible with health promotion in at least some circumstances and that, if these modifications are implemented, CQI could help health promotion achieve its goals.
Key words: best practices; Continuous Quality Improvement; health promotion; Quality Assurance
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Heward, C. Hutchins, and H. Keleher Organizational change--key to capacity building and effective health promotion Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2007; 22(2): 170 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Aro, S. Van den Broucke, and S. Raty Toward European consensus tools for reviewing the evidence and enhancing the quality of health promotion practice Promotion & Education, March 1, 2005; 12(1_suppl): 10 - 14. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Kahan and M. Goodstadt The Interactive Domain Model of Best Practices in Health Promotion: Developing and Implementing a Best Practices Approach to Health Promotion Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2001; 2(1): 43 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Latter, P. Yerrell, and J. Rycroft-Malone Governance and health promotion: a case study of medication education Health Education Journal, January 1, 2000; 59(3): 253 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|