Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boonekamp, G. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nuñez, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boonekamp, G. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nuñez, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 14, No. 2, 103-110, June 1999
© Oxford University Press 1999

Healthy Cities Evaluation: the co-ordinators perspective

Gwendolijn M. M. Boonekamp, Concha Colomer, Aleix Tomás and Agapito Nuñez

Institút Valencià d'Estudis en Salut Pública (IVESP), Valencia, Spain

Address for correspondence: Concha Colomer, IVESP, Juan de Garay 21, E-46017 Valencia, Spain

The Healthy Cities Project is based on the development of healthy public policies by local governments. The study aim of some project teams in different countries has been to find out what processes are involved in the development of these policies, how decisions are made, and who and what they are influenced by. The Valencian Community Healthy Cities Network conducted an evaluation process, part of which is presented in this paper. The aim was to find out the concepts and opinions of the project co-ordinators concerning the opportunities and problems for healthy municipal policies, and to analyse the municipal organization with a view to detecting structural opportunities for interdepartmental work. Interviews were conducted with the people responsible for the project in 13 cities and the relevant documents analysed. When discussing their health concept and actions for health, few of the co-ordinators mentioned the ideas contained in the Ottawa Charter. The established health programmes were rather based on personal/ individual changes and topic approach than setting-based strategies. The structural and strategic opportunities for interdepartmental work, as well as the active participation of the community in the healthy policies decision-making process need to be strengthened, as they are perceived to be insufficient. Personal relationships and political differences between the different actors appear to play an important role in the opportunities for the implementation of intersectoral policies.

Key words: health policies; health promotion; healthy cities; evaluation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
R. E. Aronson, B. L. Norton, and M. C. Kegler
Achieving a "Broad View of Health": Findings From the California Healthy Cities and Communities Evaluation
Health Educ Behav, June 1, 2007; 34(3): 441 - 452.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. Donchin, A. A. Shemesh, P. Horowitz, and N. Daoud
Implementation of the Healthy Cities' principles and strategies: an evaluation of the Israel Healthy Cities Network
Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2006; 21(4): 266 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. O'Neill and P. Simard
Choosing indicators to evaluate Healthy Cities projects: a political task?
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2006; 21(2): 145 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
T. Harpham, S. Burton, and I. Blue
Healthy city projects in developing countries: the first evaluation
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2001; 16(2): 111 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.