Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Reutter, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Reutter, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 14, No. 4, 355-364, December 1999
© Oxford University Press 1999

Defining and measuring poverty: implications for the health of Canadians*

Deanna L. Williamson and Linda Reutter1

Department of Human Ecology and 1 Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Address for correspondence: Deanna Williamson, Department of Human Ecology, 302 Human Ecology Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2N1, E-mail: deanna.williamson{at}ualberta.ca

This paper examines the implications that the conceptualization and measurement of poverty have for policies that aim to improve the health of Canadians. In recent years, poverty has been identified as an issue of policy importance within the health sector in Canada. Policy makers are recognizing that efforts to improve the health of Canadians are related to the development and implementation of policies that decrease the proportion of people who live in poverty. At the same time, the Statistics Canada Low-Income Cut-Offs (LICOs), which are the most commonly used tool for measuring poverty in Canada, are being called into question. One of the most frequently cited criticisms of the LICOs is that they are too high, and as such do not measure poverty. Critics who argue that the LICOs are too high disagree with the relative conceptualization of poverty which underlies the LICOs. In this paper, we discuss the LICOs, their underlying assumption that poverty is relative in nature, and the criticism that the LICOs are too high. In addition, we discuss the Sarlo/Fraser Institute poverty lines, which are based on the assumption that poverty is absolute in nature. The manner in which poverty is conceptualized and measured has implications for the types, characteristics and ultimately the success of policies that are developed to reduce poverty and its effect on health. We argue that the success of efforts to enhance the health of Canadians with a reduction in poverty depends on a commitment by policy makers to a relative conceptualization and measurement of poverty. We further contend that policy makers in the health sector cannot independently reduce poverty and its detrimental effects on health. The complex nature of poverty indicates the need for policy makers in the health sector to work collaboratively with their counterparts from a broad range of government and non-government sectors to develop an innovative network of social assistance, economic and employment policies that effectively reduce the proportion of Canadians who experience material and social deprivation.

Key words: Canada; healthy public policy; poverty and health; poverty definitions and measures


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. Wuest, M. Ford-Gilboe, M. Merritt-Gray, and H. Berman
Intrusion: The Central Problem for Family Health Promotion among Children and Single Mothers after Leaving an Abusive Partner
Qual Health Res, May 1, 2003; 13(5): 597 - 622.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.