Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macaskill, L.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Macaskill, L.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 15, No. 1, 57-69, March 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

An evaluability assessment to develop a restaurant health promotion program in Canada

Lesley Macaskill, John J. M. Dwyer, Connie Uetrecht, Carol Dombrow1, Renée Crompton2, Beth Wilck3 and Jim Stone4

Toronto Public Health Division, Toronto, 1 Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Toronto, 2 Ottawa-Carleton Public Health Department, Ottawa, Canada, 3 Middlesex-London Health Unit, London, Ontario and 4 North Bay and District Public Health Unit, North Bay, Ontario, Canada

Address for correspondence: Lesley Macaskill, Co-ordinator, ‘Eat Smart! Ontario's Healthy Restaurant Program' Toronto Public Health Division, 5100 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2N 5V7

An evaluability assessment was conducted to develop a standard, provincial restaurant health promotion program that public health units across Ontario can adopt. This assessment focused on extensive stakeholder consultation to develop a program logic model to diagrammatically describe the assumptions underlying the program. First, details about existing restaurant health promotion programs were analyzed to assist in planning the program. Based on this review, a provincial steering committee recommended that restaurants must meet minimum requirements for nutrition, food safety and non-smoking seating standards to qualify for recognition. Second, stakeholders were consulted about the program goal, target groups, and these and other possible standards. This entailed conducting focus groups with restaurant patrons and interviewing public health unit staff, restaurateurs and food service suppliers. A workgroup developed a draft logic model based on the results of the consultation. Third, community focus groups, public health unit surveys and expert reviews were conducted to assess the plausibility of the logic model. The workgroup revised the logic model based on the results of this consultation. The final logic model conceptualizes the program as: (i) three program standards for restaurateurs; (ii) social marketing activities targeted to consumers and restaurateurs; (iii) education and skill development activities targeted to restaurant managers and staff, public health unit staff and volunteers; and (iv) environmental support activities targeted to restaurateurs, public health unit staff and volunteers. The logic model shows the relationship between long-term, intermediate and short-term desired outcomes and program activities that need to be implemented provincially and locally to achieve the desired outcomes. The final logic model was subsequently communicated to various stakeholders. It is apparent that the evaluability assessment involved considerable stakeholder participation to develop the program. Thus, they should be more likely to agree with the program design and participate in the restaurant program in their community.

Key words: food safety; nutrition; restaurant; smoking


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
T. K. Gokah
Health education in rural settings in Ghana: a methodological approach
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2007; 22(6): 907 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
M. S. Trevisan
Evaluability Assessment From 1986 to 2006
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2007; 28(3): 290 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
J. J. M. Dwyer, B. Hansen, M. Barrera, K. Allison, S. Ceolin-Celestini, D. Koenig, D. Young, M. Good, and T. Rees
Maximizing children's physical activity: an evaluability assessment to plan a community-based, multi-strategy approach in an ethno-racially and socio-economically diverse city
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2003; 18(3): 199 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
W. E. Thurston, J. Graham, and J. Hatfield
Evaluability Assessment: A Catalyst for Program Change and Improvement
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2003; 26(2): 206 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.