Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vita, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vita, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 17, No. 1, 51-60, March 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Impacts from repeated mass media campaigns to promote sun protection in Australia

Ben J. Smith, Claire Ferguson1, Jeanie McKenzie1, Adrian Bauman2 and Philip Vita3

Australian Centre for Health Promotion Research Unit, Edward Ford Building A27, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia, 1 NSW Cancer Council, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, 2 School of Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia and 3 Sun Protection, Nutrition and Physical Activity Policy Unit, New South Wales Health Department, Australia

Address for correspondence: Ben J. Smith Australian Centre for Health Promotion Research Unit Edward Ford Building A27 University of Sydney New South Wales 2006 Australia

Campaigns using television, radio and print media were conducted over three summers in New South Wales, Australia, aiming to increase the use of sun protection measures among children under 12 years. The evaluation entailed cross-sectional telephone surveys before and after each of the first two campaigns and following the third campaign. The study group were parents of children under 12 years. Random digit dialling yielded samples of approximately 800 for each survey. Measures addressed campaign recall and sun protection knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. The surveys revealed significant levels of campaign recall. Knowledge about the protective benefits of sunscreens, hats and protective clothing was high at baseline and showed little improvement over the campaigns. Knowledge levels about the benefits of shade cover and of the relative risks of skin cancer from childhood sun exposure were lower, and also did not show improvement. Just one of the four attitude factors showed significant improvement, and this concerned the importance that parents placed on the issue of child sun protection. After the final campaign there were increases compared with baseline in childrens' use of sunscreen, protective clothing and shade, but it was notable that between campaigns levels of these behaviours were similar to or below those at baseline. There was no evidence of a campaign-related increase in hat wearing by children. All sun protection measures were used less often by adults than children, but these showed similar trends. Mass media campaigns may contribute to short-term increases in some sun protection behaviours; however, as their impact is not sustained they should be repeated and supplemented by educational, policy and environmental strategies.

Key words: Australia; campaigns; media; sun protection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
K. M. Hart and R. F. DeMarco
Primary Prevention of Skin Cancer in Children and Adolescents: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 67 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
S. E. Wutzke, M. A. Artist, L. A. Kehoe, M. Fletcher, J. M. Mackson, and L. M. Weekes
Evaluation of a national programme to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: effects on consumer awareness, beliefs, attitudes and behaviour in Australia
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2007; 22(1): 53 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. de Vries, I. Mesters, J. v. Riet, K. Willems, and A. Reubsaet
Motives of belgian adolescents for using sunscreen: the role of action plans.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1360 - 1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
A. I. Rubin, E. H. Chen, and D. Ratner
Basal-Cell Carcinoma.
N. Engl. J. Med., November 24, 2005; 353(21): 2262 - 2269.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
S. Whitelaw and J. Watson
Whither health promotion events? A judicial approach to evidence
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2005; 20(2): 214 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
W. R. Stanton, M. Janda, P. D. Baade, and P. Anderson
Primary prevention of skin cancer: a review of sun protection in Australia and internationally
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2004; 19(3): 369 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.