Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, W. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 17, No. 1, 61-68, March 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Influence of health promotion bureaucracy on community participation: a Canadian case study

William F. Boyce

Social Program Evaluation Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6

Address for correspondence: William F. Boyce Social Program Evaluation Group Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 3N6 E-mail: boycew{at}post.queensu.ca

SUMMARY

The purpose of this paper is to illustrate, through a Canadian case study, the bureaucratic support and obstacles for community participation in health promotion. The paper begins with a brief history of the development of a participatory health promotion programme in Canada. The role of bureaucracies on participation of communities is highlighted. Secondly, the paper describes how a variety of bureaucratic factors affected grassroots community participation efforts of local projects in one province. Finally, discussion focuses on how community participation is constrained in a bureaucratically mediated activity such as health promotion.

Key words: bureaucracy; Canada; community; health promotion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. Schmidt, T. Plochg, J. Harting, N.S. Klazinga, and K. Stronks
Micro grants as a stimulus for community action in residential health programmes: a case study
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2009; 24(3): 234 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
D. Heenan
A partnership approach to health promotion: a case study from Northern Ireland
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2004; 19(1): 105 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
J. Vinck, B. Oldenburg, and T. Von Lengerke
Editorial: Health Psychology and Public Health--Bridging the Gap
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2004; 9(1): 5 - 12.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.