Health Promotion International, Vol. 17, No. 1, 61-68,
March 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002
Influence of health promotion bureaucracy on community participation: a Canadian case study
Social Program Evaluation Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6
Address for correspondence: William F. Boyce Social Program Evaluation Group Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 3N6 E-mail: boycew{at}post.queensu.ca
SUMMARY
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate, through a Canadian case study, the bureaucratic support and obstacles for community participation in health promotion. The paper begins with a brief history of the development of a participatory health promotion programme in Canada. The role of bureaucracies on participation of communities is highlighted. Secondly, the paper describes how a variety of bureaucratic factors affected grassroots community participation efforts of local projects in one province. Finally, discussion focuses on how community participation is constrained in a bureaucratically mediated activity such as health promotion.
Key words: bureaucracy; Canada; community; health promotion
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Schmidt, T. Plochg, J. Harting, N.S. Klazinga, and K. Stronks Micro grants as a stimulus for community action in residential health programmes: a case study Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2009; 24(3): 234 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Heenan A partnership approach to health promotion: a case study from Northern Ireland Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2004; 19(1): 105 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Vinck, B. Oldenburg, and T. Von Lengerke Editorial: Health Psychology and Public Health--Bridging the Gap J Health Psychol, January 1, 2004; 9(1): 5 - 12. [PDF] |
||||

