Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 17, No. 1, 69-78, March 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Closing the gap: building the capacity of non-government organizations as advocates for health equity

Sally Nathan, Arie Rotem and Jan Ritchie

School of Medical Education, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Address for correspondence: S. A. Nathan School of Medical Education Centre for Public Health, University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia E-mail: S.Nathan{at}unsw.edu.au

SUMMARY

Seeking achievement of health equity has underpinned national government and global health policies for decades. However, major difficulties and challenges faced in the practice of achieving ‘Health for All’ has led to a recognition of the need to broaden the focus of efforts to improve health equity. Civil society groups have been identified as key stakeholders in attempts to achieve health equity, and the importance of strengthening their capacity to influence relevant government policy and practice has been highlighted. This paper presents the results of a qualitative study which examined the role of organizations outside government in advocating for health equity, and the capacities and conditions that were related to their success. In-depth, unstructured interviews were conducted with 26 non-government organizations (NGOs) who were active in three important health policy debates in Australia. The grounded theory method was used to direct data collection and analysis, and member checking was employed to ensure soundness and build ownership of the findings. Effective advocacy was found to be a dynamic process characterized by flexibility and opportunism within a framework of longer term goals. Two key ways of working were identified—in partnership and in conflict with government, with shifts in emphasis in response to organizational strengths and a changing environment. A number of domains of capacity, which together are termed ‘capacity for advocacy’, were also identified. It is clear that NGOs can learn a great deal from each other, but there needs to be investment by governments, international agencies and NGOs themselves if advocacy for health equity is to be strengthened.

Key words: advocacy; capacity building; health equity; non-government organizations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
N. Hanusaik, J. L O'Loughlin, N. Kishchuk, J. Eyles, K. Robinson, and R. Cameron
Building the backbone for organisational research in public health systems: development of measures of organisational capacity for chronic disease prevention
J Epidemiol Community Health, August 1, 2007; 61(8): 742 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
J. Vinck, B. Oldenburg, and T. Von Lengerke
Editorial: Health Psychology and Public Health--Bridging the Gap
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2004; 9(1): 5 - 12.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.