Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Earle, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Earle, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 17, No. 3, 205-214, September 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Factors affecting the initiation of breastfeeding: implications for breastfeeding promotion

Sarah Earle

University College Northampton, Centre for Healthcare Education, Boughton Green Road, Park Campus, Northampton, UK

Address for correspondence: Sarah Earle University College Northampton Centre for Healthcare Education Boughton Green Road Park Campus Northampton NN2 7AL UK E-mail: sarah.earle{at}tesco.net

Breastfeeding rates in the United Kingdom (UK) are one of the lowest in the developed world and certainly the lowest in Europe. There have been numerous studies of breastfeeding in the UK, most of which have adopted a quantitative approach, and they have largely focused on obstetric or socio-demographic factors in the decision to breastfeed. Whilst these studies have an important role to play, this paper draws on a study that adopts a qualitative methodology to explore women’s personal experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding. A qualitative study of 19 primagravidae was undertaken and completed in 1998. Participants were recruited to the study via 12 antenatal clinics in the West Midlands, England, UK. Their ages ranged from 16 to 30 years and the majority described themselves as ‘white’. The majority of participants were in paid employment in a variety of occupations. The study was prospective in design. Participants were interviewed three times either during pregnancy or after childbirth: the first stage was between 6 and 14 weeks of pregnancy; the second stage was between 34 and 39 weeks; and the third stage was between 6 and 14 weeks after childbirth. The data indicate that there are several factors affecting breastfeeding initiation. First, infant feeding decisions seem to be made prior to, or irrespective of, contact with health professionals. Secondly, the data suggest that health promotion campaigns in the UK have been influential in their ability to educate women about the benefits of breastfeeding. However, this did not dissuade participants from formula feeding once their decision was made. The desire for paternal involvement also seemed to be another influential factor; fathers were either seen as able to alleviate the daily grind of early motherhood, or there was a desire for ‘shared parenting’. Finally, some of the formula feeding women expressed a strong desire to re-establish their identities as separate individuals and as ‘non-mothers’.

Key words: barriers; breastfeeding initiation; breastfeeding promotion; qualitative research; women’s identity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
M. L. Crossley
Breastfeeding as a Moral Imperative: An Autoethnographic Study
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 2009; 19(1): 71 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Women's StudiesHome page
L. Smyth
Gendered Spaces and Intimate Citizenship: The Case of Breastfeeding
European Journal of Women's Studies, May 1, 2008; 15(2): 83 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
S. Marrone, N. Vogeltanz-Holm, and J. Holm
Attitudes, Knowledge, and Intentions Related to Breastfeeding Among University Undergraduate Women and Men
J Hum Lact, May 1, 2008; 24(2): 186 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
D. McCarter-Spaulding
Is Breastfeeding Fair? Tensions in Feminist Perspectives on Breastfeeding and the Family
J Hum Lact, May 1, 2008; 24(2): 206 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
D. Sheehan, S. Watt, P. Krueger, and W. Sword
The Impact of a New Universal Postpartum Program on Breastfeeding Outcomes
J Hum Lact, November 1, 2006; 22(4): 398 - 408.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
K. Wambach, S. H. Campbell, S. L. Gill, J. E. Dodgson, T. C. Abiona, and M. J. Heinig
Clinical Lactation Practice: 20 Years of Evidence
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2005; 21(3): 245 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.