Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turan, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yazgan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turan, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yazgan, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 18, No. 1, 25-32, March 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Community participation for perinatal health in Istanbul

Janet Molzan Turan1, Lale Say3, Ayse Köybasioglu Güngör4, Renee Demarco2 and Sule Yazgan5

Research Faculty, Institute of Child Health, Family Health Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Address for correspondence: Janet Molzan Turan, Affiliated Scholar, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Serra House, 556 Salvatierra Walk, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-8640, USA, E-mail: jmturan{at}stanford.edu

This study aimed to evaluate the success of a project in achieving community participation in efforts to improve perinatal health. A 10-step structured process was used to work with a community in Istanbul, Turkey. To evaluate the success of the project in achieving community participation, five key indicators were selected: (i) participation of the community group in decision making; (ii) gains in knowledge and skills of the community group; (iii) continuity of the community group; (iv) continuation of the health program by the community group; and (v) initiation of new support and advocacy activities. From the beginning, community members participated in all decisions regarding the group activities. In the early months, project staff had more of a guiding role, but, over time, the community members became active decision-makers. Over the course of the project they learned how to identify community health problems, and to design, implement and evaluate interventions to address those problems. Four years later, meetings and activities of the group are continuing. The antenatal education course developed by the group continues to be offered at a local community centre. Community members are now completely responsible for promoting the course, communication with participants, planning the courses, making preparations for the sessions, as well as teaching non-technical topics. Course participants have developed ongoing support networks and have begun to advocate for better perinatal health services in the community. Working with a community is an intensive, time-consuming process. The results of this project indicate that the benefits, both in terms of health outcomes and in terms of increases in community capacity, can be well worth the effort.

Key words: community participation; health education; perinatal health; Turkey


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.