Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Perwaiz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Perwaiz, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 18, No. 4, 287-296, December 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003 All rights reserved

Evaluation of a pilot school programme aimed at the prevention of obesity in children

J. M. Warren, C. J. K. Henry, H. J. Lightowler, S. M. Bradshaw and S. Perwaiz

Nutrition and Food Science Group, School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK

Address for correspondence: Dr Janet Warren, Research Dietitian, Nutrition and Food Science Group, School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK E-mail: jmwarren{at}brookes.ac.uk

This paper describes the development, implementation and evaluation of a school- and family-based intervention to prevent obesity in children aged 5–7 years. In addition, the efficacy of three different intervention programmes was compared. Children aged 5–7 years (n = 213) were recruited from three primary schools in Oxford and randomly allocated to a control group or one of three intervention groups: nutrition group, physical activity group, and combined nutrition and physical activity group. The setting for the interventions was lunchtime clubs, where an interactive and age-appropriate nutrition and/or physical activity curriculum was delivered. The intervention lasted for 20 weeks over four school terms (~14 months). Children's growth, nutrition knowledge, diet and physical activity were assessed at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Significant improvements in nutrition knowledge were seen in all children (p < 0.01) between baseline and post-intervention, and results were highly significant in the nutrition and combined group (p < 0.001). Overall, fruit and vegetable intake increased significantly (p < 0.01 and <0.05, respectively), with changes seen in fruit consumption in the nutrition group (p < 0.05) and the control group (p < 0.05) in particular. No significant changes in the rates of overweight and obesity were seen as a result of the intervention. Gender differences were not detected in the majority of assessments and there was no clear effect of programme type per se. This pilot study has demonstrated that school may be a suitable setting for the promotion of healthy lifestyles in children, but requires replication in other social settings. Future initiatives should be long-lasting, multi-faceted and sustainable, involving all children in a school, and should target the whole environment and be behaviourally focused. The ultimate goal of any such programme is to lead to positive behaviour change which will have a beneficial effect on long-term health. Successful targeting of the family remains a challenge to such interventions.

Key words: children; obesity; prevention; school-based intervention


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
F. A. Carter and C. M. Bulik
Childhood Obesity Prevention Programs: How Do They Affect Eating Pathology and Other Psychological Measures?
Psychosom Med, April 1, 2008; 70(3): 363 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of School NursingHome page
K. G. Speroni, C. Earley, and M. Atherton
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Kids Living FitTM Program: A Comparative Study
The Journal of School Nursing, December 1, 2007; 23(6): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. M. Davis, B. Gance-Cleveland, S. Hassink, R. Johnson, G. Paradis, and K. Resnicow
Recommendations for Prevention of Childhood Obesity
Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 120(Supplement_4): S229 - S253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. W Taylor, K. A McAuley, W. Barbezat, A. Strong, S. M Williams, and J. I Mann
APPLE Project: 2-y findings of a community-based obesity prevention program in primary school age children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 735 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
S. Laurence, R. Peterken, and C. Burns
Fresh Kids: the efficacy of a Health Promoting Schools approach to increasing consumption of fruit and water in Australia
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2007; 22(3): 218 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
J. Salmon, M. L. Booth, P. Phongsavan, N. Murphy, and A. Timperio
Promoting Physical Activity Participation among Children and Adolescents
Epidemiol. Rev., June 7, 2007; (2007) mxm010v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
H. Thomas
Obesity prevention programs for children and youth: why are their results so modest?
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2006; 21(6): 783 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
K. D. Reynolds and D. Spruijt-Metz
Translational research in childhood obesity prevention.
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2006; 29(2): 219 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.