Health Promotion International, Vol. 18, No. 4, 351-359, December 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003 All rights reserved
Building health promoting work settings: identifying the relationship between work characteristics and occupational stress in Australia
Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
Address for correspondence: Dr Andrew Noblet, School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood Victoria 3125, Australia, E-mail: anoblet{at}deakin.edu.au
Occupational stress is a serious threat to the health of individual workers, their families and the community at large. The settings approach to health promotion offers valuable opportunities for developing comprehensive strategies to prevent and reduce job stress. However, there is evidence that many workplace health promotion programs adopt traditional, lifestyle-oriented strategies when dealing with occupational stress, and ignore the impact that the setting itself has on the health of employees. The aim of the present study was to address two of the barriers to adopting the settings approach; namely the lack of information on how psycho-social work characteristics can influence health, and not having the confidence or knowledge to identify or address organizational-level issues. A comprehensive occupational stress audit involving qualitative and quantitative research methods was undertaken in a small- to medium-sized public sector organization in Australia. The results revealed that the work characteristics ‘social support’ and ‘job control’ accounted for large proportions of explained variance in job satisfaction and psychological health. In addition to these generic variables, several job-specific stressors were found to be predictive of the strain experienced by employees. When coupled with the results of other studies, these findings suggest that work characteristics (particularly control and support) offer valuable avenues for creating work settings that can protect and enhance employee health. The implications of the methods used to develop and complete the stress audit are also discussed.
Key words: health promoting settings; occupational stress; workplace health promotion
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. J. Lawson, A. J. Noblet, and J. J. Rodwell Promoting employee wellbeing: the relevance of work characteristics and organizational justice Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2009; 24(3): 223 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. van Heugten Bullying of Social Workers: Outcomes of a Grounded Study into Impacts and Interventions Br. J. Soc. Work, February 3, 2009; (2009) bcp003v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Noblet and A. D. LaMontagne The role of workplace health promotion in addressing job stress Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2006; 21(4): 346 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kokko, L. Kannas, and J. Villberg The health promoting sports club in Finland--a challenge for the settings-based approach Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2006; 21(3): 219 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Arneson and K. Ekberg Evaluation of empowerment processes in a workplace health promotion intervention based on learning in Sweden Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2005; 20(4): 351 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. PATON, S. SENGUPTA, and L. HASSAN Settings, systems and organization development: the Healthy Living and Working Model Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2005; 20(1): 81 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|