Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KAPLAN, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KAPLAN, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, D. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 2, No. 4, 331-340, 1987
© Oxford University Press 1987


research-article

The cost-utility of diet and exercise interventions in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

ROBERT M. KAPLAN, CATHERINE J. ATKINS and DAWN K. WILSON

Center for Behavioral Medicine, San Diego State University and Department of Community and Family Medicine, University of California San Diego, California, USA Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, California, USA Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee, USA Substantial evidence suggests that obesity is associated with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and that weight reduction precedes improvements in glucose intolerance. However, achieving weight loss requires labour-intensive behavioural interventions. We evaluated the cost-utility of behavioural interventions in an experimental study of 76 NIDDM adults. In comparison with an education control group, adults randomly assigned to a diet-plus-exercise programme showed significant improvement in health status over an eighteen-month period. Using a general health policy model, we estimated that the programme produced 0.092 well-years for each participant. Programme costs were estimated using usual charges for physical examinations, blood tests, ECG evaluations, behaviour modification, and medical supervision. These costs totalled approximately US $1000 per participant. The cost-utility ratio was US $1000/0.092 = $10 870 per well-year. Using the general health policy model, the cost-utility of the behavioural intervention programmes was shown to be competitive with other widely advocated medical interventions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.