Skip Navigation


Health Promotion International Advance Access originally published online on December 9, 2005
Health Promotion International 2006 21(1):55-65; doi:10.1093/heapro/dai030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/55    most recent
dai030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dooris, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dooris, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

PERSPECTIVES

Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness

Mark Dooris

University Of Central Lancashire, Lancashire, UK

Address for correspondence: Mark Dooris, Director, Healthy Settings Development Unit, Lancashire School of Health and Postgraduate Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK E-mail: mtdooris{at}uclan.ac.uk

This paper starts by briefly reviewing the history, theory and practice of the settings approach to promoting public health—highlighting its ecological perspective, its understanding of settings as dynamic open systems and its primary focus on whole system organization development and change. It goes on to outline perceived benefits and consider why, almost 20 years after the Ottawa Charter advocated the approach, there remains a relatively poorly developed evidence base of effectiveness. Identifying three key challenges—relating to the construction of the evidence base for health promotion, the diversity of conceptual understandings and real-life practice and the complexity of evaluating ecological whole system approaches—it suggests that these have resulted in an ongoing tendency to evaluate only discrete projects in settings, thus failing to capture the ‘added value’ of whole system working. It concludes by exploring the potential value of theory-based evaluation and identifying key issues that will need to be addressed in moving forward—funding evaluation within and across settings; ensuring links between evidence, policy and practice; and clarifying and articulating the theories that underpin the settings approach generically and inform the approach as applied within particular settings.

Key words: ecology; evaluation; evidence; organization development; settings; systems


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Promotion & EducationHome page
M. Dooris
Health promoting settings: future directions
Promotion & Education, March 1, 2006; 13(1): 2 - 4.
[PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.