Skip Navigation


Health Promotion International Advance Access originally published online on December 9, 2005
Health Promotion International 2006 21(1):66-69; doi:10.1093/heapro/dai033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/66    most recent
dai033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwak, L.
Right arrow Articles by Brug, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kwak, L.
Right arrow Articles by Brug, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

PERSPECTIVES

Participation rates in worksite-based intervention studies: health promotion context as a crucial quality criterion

L. Kwak1, S. P. J. Kremers2, M. A. van Baak1 and J. Brug3

1Department of Human Biology and 2Department of Health Education and Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands and 3Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Address for correspondence: L. Kwak Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands E-mail: l.kwak{at}hb.unimaas.nl

Recently, a set of specific quality evaluation criteria for health promotion research has been proposed in this journal. One of the quality criteria identified is the ‘health promotion context’. With this paper we would like to contribute to the dialogue by specifying the importance of this criterion on the basis of our on experience with worksite-based obesity prevention interventions. We advocate the reporting of participation rates among approached worksites in publications on worksite intervention effects. Such information will help to draw conclusions on the practical relevance of the shown effectiveness of the intervention. Health promotion practice is advised to adopt and disseminate evidence-based interventions, accompanied by a diffusion study with a minimal research burden for participants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.