Health Promotion International Advance Access originally published online on March 27, 2006
Health Promotion International 2006 21(2):160-168; doi:10.1093/heapro/dal010
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Studying the striving and opposing forces in newspaper journalism: the actantial model of health promotion
Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere Finland
Address for correspondence: Pauliina Aarva, Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, FIN-33014, Finland E-mail: pauliina.aarva{at}uta.fi
The cultural aspects of health promotion are important in policy development as well as in assessing effectiveness of health promotion activities. The discourses on promoting health and well-being in journalism reflect the health promotion culture in society. This article illustrates how health promotion is portrayed by 147 newspaper items from the two Finnish quality dailies during the period 2002–2004 and introduces a semiotic Actantial Model of Health Promotion (AMHP) for studying health promotion cultures. The most popular news themes on health promotion were physical and social environment, welfare services, nutrition and obesity, and mental well-being. The actants (actors, actions and abstract factor) of health promotion were identified and the AMHP with seven key actants (generator, health-object, public, tool, executor, threat and obstacle) was constructed. The model sheds light on two sides of health promotion discourses in journalism. The dominant culture of health promotion was represented by policy actions, information, education and scientific research, which were defined by health experts, decision-makers and researchers. Representations of the opposite culture—‘the otherness’ of health promotion included external harmful factors and unhealthy behaviours, mentalities opposed to being health-oriented, rationally uncontrolled living, disorder, disharmony and insecurity. The opposing factors were presented by people and institutions lacking the will, ability or motivation for a health-oriented life. To understand better the values of health promotion, it is necessary to assess the characteristics of the opposite side of health promotion culture, because the current dominant values can be described more clearly by the boundaries—by ‘otherness’. The study argues that the AMHP can be used as a semiotic method to identify the value dimensions and the boundaries between the dominant and the opposite discourses of health promotion in various communications such as advertising and health education. Also, it provides a tool for the analysis of the media's role in ‘victimization’ or ‘heroization’ of various population groups.
Key words: media; semiotics; culture of health promotion; values