Skip Navigation


Health Promotion International Advance Access originally published online on October 29, 2008
Health Promotion International 2008 23(4):380-390; doi:10.1093/heapro/dan032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/4/380    most recent
dan032v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tannahill, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tannahill, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


DEBATE

Beyond evidence—to ethics: a decision-making framework for health promotion, public health and health improvement{dagger}

Andrew Tannahill*

NHS Health Scotland, Elphinstone House, 65 West Regent Street, Glasgow G2 2AF, Scotland, UK

* Corresponding author. E-mail: andrew.tannahill{at}health.scot.nhs.uk


   Abstract

Echoing the rise of ‘evidence-based medicine’, the concept of evidence-based policy and practice in the inter-related fields of health promotion, public health and health improvement has attracted increasing attention over the past two decades. More recently, again with roots traceable to biomedical thinking, there has been growing interest in ethics in relation to these fields. This paper links these two topical themes in a practical way. It explores the extent to which policies and activities ‘on the ground’ can and should be based on evidence, and considers the relative places of evidence and ethics in decision-making. It goes on to present the ‘decision-making triangle’, a framework that gives primacy to a set of ethical principles—with available evidence and plausible theory being used to inform the application of these. After introducing the concept of ‘ethical logic modelling’, the paper concludes by suggesting an ‘ethical imperative’ for health promotion, public health and health improvement: to make decisions based on the explicit application of ethical principles, using available evidence and theory appropriately.

Key words: ethics; evidence; decision-making; health promotion; public health; health improvement


{dagger} This paper has been developed from a presentation given by the author at the international conference ‘Setting an Ethical Agenda for Health Promotion’, held at the University of Ghent, Belgium from 18 to 20 September 2007 and organized by the University of Ghent (Institute for Law, Ethics and Society, and Department of Public Health) and the Flemish Institute for Health Promotion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.