Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by INGLEDEW, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by INGLEDEW, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 4, No. 4, 357-369, 1989
© Oxford University Press 1989


other

Target setting for the health of populations: some observations

DAVID INGLEDEW

Mersey Regional Health Authority Liverpool, United Kingdom* This article is the result of a World Health Organization (WHO) Travelling Fellowship, looking at target setting for health promotion. At first sight, target setting for the health of populations appears to be a logical process whereby broad goals for health are broken down into specific objectives and interventions, with success measured by achievement of the broad health goals. The evidence reviewed indicates, however, that achievement of broad health goals can happen without many of the supposedly contributory interventions, suggesting that success in target setting can be more a matter of predicting trends in public health than influencing those trends. One major consequence of relying upon existing trends for success in achieving broad health goals is that the problem of inequalities will not be addressed since the natural tendency of inequalities is not to diminish. It is concluded that in setting targets, a clear distinction should be made between what seems to be going to happen anyway and what incremental benefits are anticipated from particular interventions; and that a special emphasis should be placed upon the reduction of inequalities not only as a matter of principle, but also as a check against spurious claims of success in achieving broad health goals.

Where target setting is handled at sub-national level, this can only ever be a supplement and not a substitute for national action. At sub-national level, one increasingly common approach appears to be to look at inequalities in health between small geographical areas and to use localized health promotion methods. It is concluded that this is one valid approach, but it has limitations, and should not lead to the neglect of other dimensions of inequality and other health promotion interventions that require a wider, for example regional or city-wide, base. Healthy Cities may need to clarify aims and objectives, in particular European Healthy Cities may need to clarify the extent to which they see themselves as local agents for the WHO Europe targets.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.