Health Promotion International, Vol. 6, No. 3, 199-206, 1991
© Oxford University Press 1991
research-article |
A new approach to community participation assessment
Karolinska Institute, Department of Social Medicine Sundbyberg, Sweden Institute of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, SAI, University of Heidelberg Federal Republic of Germany
Address for correspondence: Gunilla Bjãrås Karolinska Institute Department of Social Medicine Kronan Health Centre 17283 Sundbyberg Sweden
It is important to investigate the processes which influence participation in a community-wide intervenlion programme, to see if the programme actually evolved from an idea to reality. A method for assessing community participation in health programmes has been developed and so far niainly applied in developing countries. The method uses five indicators that strongly influence the community participation process. These are: needs assessment, leadership, organization, resource mobilization and management. This method was used to analyse the community development process in a community intervention programme aimed at preventing accidents, in Sollentuna municipality, Stockholm County. An asses.snrent of the participation process was made for years 2 and 4, indicating that participation had expanded. The method was of value for describing and understanding the participation process and was also found to be relevant in an accident prevention programme in an industrialized country. The method was also found robe a valuable educational tool when used as a process indicator for the programme, and important for understanding change.
Key words: community intervention; community participation; health systems research
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Nilsen The theory of community based health and safety programs: a critical examination. Inj. Prev., June 1, 2006; 12(3): 140 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Eyre and R. Gauld Community participation in a rural community health trust: the case of Lawrence, New Zealand Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2003; 18(3): 189 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Laverack Building capable communities: experiences in a rural Fijian context Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2003; 18(2): 99 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Peltomaki, M. Johansson, W. Ahrens, M. Sala, C. Wesseling, F. Brenes, C. Font, K. Husman, G. Janer, T. Kallas-Tarpila, et al. Social context for workplace health promotion: feasibility considerations in Costa Rica, Finland, Germany, Spain and Sweden Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2003; 18(2): 115 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. M. Boonekamp, C. Colomer, A. Tomas, and A. Nunez Healthy Cities Evaluation: the co-ordinators perspective Health Promot. Int., June 1, 1999; 14(2): 103 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

