Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DELEEUW, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DELEEUW, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 8, No. 1, 49-52, 1993
© Oxford University Press 1993


research-article

Health policy, epidemiology and power: the interest web

EVELYNE DELEEUW

Department of Health Ethics and Philosophy, University of Limburg Maastricht, The Netherlands

Address for correspondence: Address for correspondence: Evelyne de Leeuw, Department of Health Ethics and Philosophy, Section Health Promotion, University of Limburg, PO Box 616, 6200 MID Maastricht, The Netherlands

The relation between epidemiological research results and policy-ma king is reviewed. Apparently, traditional models of policy-making (incrementalism, mixed scanning synoptic planning) do not explain why research findings are hardly used in policy-making procedures.

It is suggested that this phenomenon is related to three determinants of policy-making: (i) a bias stemming from sets of causal, final and normative assumptions and presuppositions; (ii) interest webs of groups in certain domains; and (iii) the power of organizations to monitor and communicate. The conclusion is that epidemiologists should engage in the policy-making process more consciously and conscientiously.

Key words: epidemiology; health policy and planning; power and planning


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. Hoeijmakers, E. De Leeuw, P. Kenis, and N. K. De Vries
Local health policy development processes in the Netherlands: an expanded toolbox for health promotion
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2007; 22(2): 112 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J Roorda, W A H J van Stiphout, and R R R Huijsman-Rubingh
Post-disaster health effects: strategies for investigation and data collection. Experiences from the Enschede firework disaster
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2004; 58(12): 982 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
T. Stahl, A. Rutten, D. Nutbeam, and L. Kannas
The importance of policy orientation and environment on physical activity participation--a comparative analysis between Eastern Germany, Western Germany and Finland
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2002; 17(3): 235 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
E. de Leeuw
Healthy Cities: urban social entrepreneurship for health
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 1999; 14(3): 261 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.