Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McARDLE, M.
Right arrow Articles by WARD, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McARDLE, M.
Right arrow Articles by WARD, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 8, No. 4, 275-280, 1993
© Oxford University Press 1993


research-article

Consumer choice and Ireland's tobacco regulations: do restaurateurs meet their client's needs?

MAEVE McARDLE, C. CECILY KELLEHER and JAMES J. WARD

University College Galway, Republic of Ireland Department of Health Promotion, University College Galway, Republic of Ireland Marketing Department, University College Galway, Republic of Ireland

Address for correspondence: Address for correspondence: Maeve McArdle, 31a Fr Murray Park, Dundalk, Co. Louth, Republic of Ireland

The Tobacco (Health Promotion and Protection) Act 1988 of the Republic of Ireland and its subsequent regulations restrict the consumption of tobacco products in certain designated public places. These restrictions include restaurants and public eating places and specify that each should provide a no smoking section for their non-smoking patrons.

This study was designed to establish whether a mismatch exists between what the restaurants offer and what the consumer wants. A telephone survey was conducted of all the listed retail food premises in Galway City in the West of Ireland Participation were 80%. Twenty-nine per cent of these provide no smoke free section at all, 68% allocate 50% of restaurant floor space to these clients. Effects on business either way were perceived as minimal, 71% saying that these regulations had no effect at all. The restaurateurs had no perception of a positive benefit associated with compliance with the regulations and most did not know what percentage of the population smoked, giving a significant over-estimation.

On the other hand, a survey sample of 100 members of the general public which was carried out at the same time, revealed that the majority of these were aware of the regulations and were willing to comply with them, whether smokers or not. The sample of smokers (35%) and non-smokers (65%) gave their views on the accommodation provided by the restaurants, their attitudes on smoking and health and the regulations. The evidence from this part of the study implied a potential marketing benefit to Restaurateurs in implementing the legislation.

The survey identified a possible mismatch in views between the restaurateurs and their clients in regard to the regulations.

Key words: smoking; regulations; restaurants


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
P. Fitzpatrick, I. Gilroy, K. Doherty, D. Corradino, L. Daly, A. Clarke, and C. C. Kelleher
Implementation of a campus-wide Irish hospital smoking ban in 2009: prevalence and attitudinal trends among staff and patients in lead up
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2009; 24(3): 211 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
B. R. Crisp and H. Swerissen
Critical processes for creating health-promoting sporting environments in Australia
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2003; 18(2): 145 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
M. Courts
Encouraging no-smoking policies in restaurants and cafes in Cornwall
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1995; 54(3): 340 - 346.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.