Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WORSLEY, A.
Right arrow Articles by MURPHY, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WORSLEY, A.
Right arrow Articles by MURPHY, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 9, No. 4, 231-240, 1994
© Oxford University Press 1994


research-article

Attitudes to food and nutrition policy from five different sectors in Australia

ANTHONY WORSLEY and SUSAN MURPHY

Food Policy Research Unit, CSIRO-Australia Adelaide, Australia Faculty of Management, University of Canberra Australia

Address for correspondence: Address for correspondence: Dr A. Worsley Food Policy Research Unit CSIRO, Division of Human Nutrition PO Box 10041, Gouger Street Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia

This study attempted to examine the views of representatives of five sectors of the Australian food and nutrition system about ways in which consumers' nutrition status can be strengthened. The study was conducted in two stages: stage one was in the form of a postal Delphi survey in which 56 representatives drawn from the farming, food processing, regulatory, food safety and nutrition sectors were asked to suggest ways to improve the Australian food sytem. These results were summarised in the form of a short 64 item opinion statement inventory. In stage two this was completed (via postal administration) by 253 representatives from the same five sectors. The findings show that there was widespread support for policy proposals to do with education and enforcement of current regulations. However, there were also major differences between the groups. Multidimensional scaling and discriminant analytic approaches showed that food processors and regulators tended to hold views supportive of the present status quo, whereas nutritionists and, to a lesser extent, farmers and food safety personnel supported changes to the system. The possible causes of these differences are discussed along with the implications of the findings for the implementation of the Australian food and nutrition policy.

Key words: Australia; Delphi; food and nutrition policy; food system; survey


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.