Health Promotion International, Vol. 9, No. 4, 289-296, 1994
© Oxford University Press 1994
other |
Disseminating research results-the challenge of bridging the gap between health research and health action
Research Unit in Health and Behavioural Change, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK
Address for correspondence: Address for correspondence: Catriona Crosswaite Research Unit in Health and Behavioural Change University of Edinburgh 24 Buccleuch Place Edinburgh EH8 9LN UK
Dissemination is now acknowledged as an important component of the research process. A Scottish-based project has researched theoretical and practical aspects of dissemination for health promotion research. This project included: a literature review, annotated bibliography, guideline document and a series of workshops in Scotland. Dissemination is about the communication of innovation, this being either a planned and systematic process or a passive, unplanned diffusion process. The utilization of research findings in policy or practice is in many instances a subtle and indirect process. Effective communication is an important aspect of dissemination. However, because the audience for health promotion research is heterogeneous, dissemination has to meet the various requirements of different users. There are many barriers to effective communication between researchers and users. These include: career structures, institutional barriers, ownership issues, barriers relating to the protracted process of publishing in academic journals, technical barriers and problems related to secrecy and lack of trust. Enhancing dialogue between researchers and users, developing new contacts and networks, the creation of Research Liaison Officers and developing effective dissemination strategies can bridge the communication gap. The current contract culture in which health promotion research is commissioned could result in a more controlled and limited dissemination stage. It is argued that researchers have a duty to share new knowledge with a wider audience including the general public. Effective dissemination requires an active and systematic approach which is adequately resourced throughout.
Key words: dissemination; health promotion; research use
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Jacobson Social Epistemology: Theory for the "Fourth Wave" of Knowledge Transfer and Exchange Research Science Communication, September 1, 2007; 29(1): 116 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Freeman Epistemological Bricolage: How Practitioners Make Sense of Learning Administration Society, July 1, 2007; 39(4): 476 - 496. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-R. Phaneuf, J. Lomas, C. McCutcheon, J. Church, and D. Wilson Square Pegs in Round Holes: The Relative Importance of Traditional and Nontraditional Scholarship in Canadian Universities Science Communication, June 1, 2007; 28(4): 501 - 518. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Robinson, S. J. Elliott, S. M. Driedger, J. Eyles, J. O'Loughlin, B. Riley, R. Cameron, D. Harvey, and on behalf of the CHHDP Strategic and Research Advi Using linking systems to build capacity and enhance dissemination in heart health promotion: a Canadian multiple-case study Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2005; 20(5): 499 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Jacobson, D. Butterill, and P. Goering Organizational Factors that Influence University-Based Researchers' Engagement in Knowledge Transfer Activities Science Communication, March 1, 2004; 25(3): 246 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Philip, K. Backett-Milburn, S. Cunningham-Burley, and J. B. Davis Practising what we preach? A practical approach to bringing research, policy and practice together in relation to children and health inequalities Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2003; 18(5): 568 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. J. Elliott, J. O'Loughlin, K. Robinson, J. Eyles, R. Cameron, D. Harvey, K. Raine, and D. Gelskey Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: The Case of the Canadian Heart Health Initiative Health Educ Behav, June 1, 2003; 30(3): 267 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. N. Lavis, M. S. R. Farrant, and G. L. Stoddart Barriers to employment-related healthy public policy in Canada Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2001; 16(1): 9 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Duffy The Internet as a research and dissemination resource Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2000; 15(4): 349 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Backett-Milburn, S. Platt, and J. Watson Understanding the commissioning process: the background to effective health promotion research and evaluation Health Education Journal, January 1, 1998; 57(2): 174 - 183. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Blackburn, H. Graham, and P. Scullion Disseminating research findings on women's smoking to health practitioners: findings from an evaluation study Health Education Journal, January 1, 1997; 56(2): 113 - 124. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. van Teijlingen, J. Friend, and F. Twine Problems of evaluation: lessons from a Smokebusters campaign Health Education Journal, January 1, 1995; 54(3): 357 - 366. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|