Skip Navigation


Health Promotion International Advance Access originally published online on November 3, 2007
Health Promotion International 2007 22(4):269-270; doi:10.1093/heapro/dam034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/269    most recent
dam034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Leeuw, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Leeuw, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The imperative of control

Evelyne de Leeuw, Assistant Editor

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

When we are researching and teaching health promotion, inevitably there is one student who dares ask the question: ‘If you take that definition of yours seriously, everything is health promotion. I find that hard to handle. Wouldn't it be better, if only for my own sanity, to limit our understanding of what health promotion is?’

I am always tempted to first blame myself for the insecurity I have installed in such students; I am a bit of a traditionalist, and therefore stick to the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

ANNOUNCEMENT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?