Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buck, D.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buck, D.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol 12, 239-250, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Debate. The contribution of health promotion to meeting health targets: questions of measurement, attribution and responsibility

D Buck, C Godfrey and A Morgan
Centre for Health Economics, and Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York, Heslington, York YO1 5DD, UK; Health Education Authority, Hamilton House, Mabledon Place, London, UK; Corresponding author

Target-setting for health is now an accepted part of health policy and has been embodied in the recent health policy documents of many nations. All include a major role for health promotion. However, if health targets are to be reached, except by good fortune, progress towards them needs to be monitored ('measurement'), the reasons for movement towards and away from them need to be understood ('attribution') and action taken by those responsible if monitoring implies they are likely to be missed ('responsibility'). This paper asks whether these important conditions hold for target-setting in relation to health promotion. Health promotion monitoring frameworks certainly exist, but do we know enough about attribution or responsibility to take any necessary corrective action? Do we have the information and tools needed to reach the plethora of health targets set out in various World Health Organization (WHO) documents and their national counterparts? This paper concludes 'no, not at the present time'. However there is cause for optimism-in our view, the attribution problem in health promotion at the macro-level can certainly be tackled. A significant proportion of this paper is therefore devoted to discussing-with examples-some of the computer modelling and statistical techniques that, although relatively unexplored to date, offer great potential for attributing the contribution of health promotion to health targets. The paper focuses on the UK experience to illustrate the general points raised in these debates. Assigning responsibility for meeting health promotion and health targets is, however, likely to remain problematical.Key words: attribution; health targets; measurement; responsibility
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
J. G R Howie, D. J Heaney, M. Maxwell, J. J Walker, G. K Freeman, and H. Rai
Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey
BMJ, September 18, 1999; 319(7212): 738 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.