Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buetow, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerse, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buetow, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerse, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 16, No. 1, 73-78, March 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Does reported health promotion activity neglect people with ill-health?

Stephen A. Buetow and Ngaire M. Kerse1

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand and 1 Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Address for correspondence: Dr S. Buetow, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

SUMMARY

Considering health as an alternative to ill-health ignores the multidimensionality of both concepts and invites neglect of health promotion as a multidimensional activity in persons with known ill-health. Drawing on the Ottawa Charter and Mori perspectives of health, we interpret (ill) health according to people's ability to function in their environment by developing physical, psychological, social and spiritual resources for living. We use this framework to test empirically our hypothesis that although the concept of health promotion has always included people with ill-health, the practice of health promotion has continued to neglect them. Our exploratory review of articles published during 1989–99 and indexed on three electronic databases suggests widespread omission of people with ill-health from research on interventions for health promotion. Of 881 citations, approximately three-quarters included people without ill-health in any dimension. This finding could reflect a failure to include these people in health promotion, to describe activity to improve their health as health promotion, or both. Supporting the latter interpretation is uncertainty over the meaning of health, and the targeting of health promotion at groups at high risk of ill-health and ‘all’ persons. We need therefore to enable health promotion activity to include ill people explicitly.

Key words: health; health promotion; intervention; multidimensional


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
S. Quine, H. Kendig, C. Russell, and D. Touchard
Health promotion for socially disadvantaged groups: the case of homeless older men in Australia
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2004; 19(2): 157 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.