Health Promotion International, Vol. 17, No. 4, 351-361,
December 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002
Opportunity structures: urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia
Department of Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001 and 1 Department of Anthropology, University of Adelaide, Australia
Address for correspondence: Fran Baum Department of Public Health Flinders University GPO Box 2100 Adelaide 5001 South Australia E-mail: fran.baum{at}flinders.edu.au
This paper presents data from 40 in-depth interviews that were conducted as part of a study of social capital and health in relation to peoples perceptions of the influence of place on their participation levels and health. These data were used to examine features of the western suburbs of Adelaide that were perceived as health damaging and health promoting. The paper demonstrates that our Australian suburban respondents expressed a considerable concern about these features and the impact they have on their perception of community and their ability to participate in it. Safety, connectedness to the area, the reputation of an area and the extent and nature of community facilities are all seen as important to a healthy community. The research found that in the more deprived socioeconomic areas within the study area, there was a significant degree of dissatisfaction with features of the urban environment, such as availability of amenities, provision of public transport, and proximity of industry to private dwellings. The paper concludes by considering certain features of urban environments that might make them more supportive of health through encouraging contact between people. We conclude that these environments could be improved using the following measures: a subsidy scheme to support the viability of local shops and cafés (thereby providing meeting places and employment); parks with facilitators (who could play a role in increasing safety in the park but also encouraging community development); attractive places to walk; and a general environmental improvement program.
Key words: health promotion; location; social capital; urban environments
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Adams, K. Witten, and K. Conway Community development as health promotion: evaluating a complex locality-based project in New Zealand Community Dev. J., April 1, 2009; 44(2): 140 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Richard, L. Gauvin, C. Gosselin, and S. Laforest Staying connected: neighbourhood correlates of social participation among older adults living in an urban environment in Montreal, Quebec Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2009; 24(1): 46 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Maycock and P. Howat Social capital: implications from an investigation of illegal anabolic steroid networks Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2007; 22(6): 854 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yuasa, R. F. de Sa, S. Pincovsky, and N. Shimanouchi Emergence Model of social and human capital and its application to the Healthy Municipalities project in Northeast Brazil Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2007; 22(4): 292 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pearce, K. Witten, and P. Bartie Neighbourhoods and health: a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2006; 60(5): 389 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Whitley and M. Prince Can urban regeneration programmes assist coping and recovery for people with mental illness? Suggestions from a qualitative case study Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2006; 21(1): 19 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F E Baum and A M Ziersch Social capital J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2003; 57(5): 320 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



