Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baum, F.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baum, F.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Promotion International, Vol. 17, No. 4, 351-361, December 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

‘Opportunity structures’: urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia

Fran Baum and Catherine Palmer1

Department of Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001 and 1 Department of Anthropology, University of Adelaide, Australia

Address for correspondence: Fran Baum Department of Public Health Flinders University GPO Box 2100 Adelaide 5001 South Australia E-mail: fran.baum{at}flinders.edu.au

This paper presents data from 40 in-depth interviews that were conducted as part of a study of social capital and health in relation to people’s perceptions of the influence of ‘place’ on their participation levels and health. These data were used to examine features of the western suburbs of Adelaide that were perceived as health damaging and health promoting. The paper demonstrates that our Australian suburban respondents expressed a considerable concern about these features and the impact they have on their perception of community and their ability to participate in it. Safety, connectedness to the area, the reputation of an area and the extent and nature of community facilities are all seen as important to a healthy community. The research found that in the more deprived socioeconomic areas within the study area, there was a significant degree of dissatisfaction with features of the urban environment, such as availability of amenities, provision of public transport, and proximity of industry to private dwellings. The paper concludes by considering certain features of urban environments that might make them more supportive of health through encouraging contact between people. We conclude that these environments could be improved using the following measures: a subsidy scheme to support the viability of local shops and cafés (thereby providing meeting places and employment); parks with facilitators (who could play a role in increasing safety in the park but also encouraging community development); attractive places to walk; and a general environmental improvement program.

Key words: health promotion; location; social capital; urban environments


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
J. Adams, K. Witten, and K. Conway
Community development as health promotion: evaluating a complex locality-based project in New Zealand
Community Dev. J., April 1, 2009; 44(2): 140 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
L. Richard, L. Gauvin, C. Gosselin, and S. Laforest
Staying connected: neighbourhood correlates of social participation among older adults living in an urban environment in Montreal, Quebec
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2009; 24(1): 46 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
B. R. Maycock and P. Howat
Social capital: implications from an investigation of illegal anabolic steroid networks
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2007; 22(6): 854 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. Yuasa, R. F. de Sa, S. Pincovsky, and N. Shimanouchi
Emergence Model of social and human capital and its application to the Healthy Municipalities project in Northeast Brazil
Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2007; 22(4): 292 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J. Pearce, K. Witten, and P. Bartie
Neighbourhoods and health: a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility
J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2006; 60(5): 389 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
R. Whitley and M. Prince
Can urban regeneration programmes assist coping and recovery for people with mental illness? Suggestions from a qualitative case study
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2006; 21(1): 19 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
F E Baum and A M Ziersch
Social capital
J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2003; 57(5): 320 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.