Health Promotion International, Vol. 18, No. 4, 339-350, December 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003 All rights reserved
Working with Toronto neighbourhoods toward developing indicators of community capacity
Centre for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, 100 College Street, Suite 207, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1L5, Canada
Address for correspondence: Suzanne F. Jackson, Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, 100 College St., Suite 207, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L5, E-mail:
Often the goal of health and social development agencies is to assess communities and work with them to improve community capacity. Particularly for health promoters working in community settings and to ensure consistency in the definition of health promotion, the evaluation of health promotion programmes should be based on strengths and assets, yet existing information for planning and evaluation purposes usually focuses on problems and deficits. A model and definition of community capacity, grounded in community experience and focusing on strengths and assets, was developed following a 4-year, multi-site, qualitative, action research project in four Toronto neighbourhoods. There was significant community involvement in the four Community Advisory Committees, one for each study site. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews and focus groups were conducted with 161 residents and agency workers identified by the Community Advisory Committees. The data were analyzed with the assistance of NUDIST software. Thematic analysis was undertaken in two stages: (i) within each site and (ii) across sites, with the latter serving as the basis for the development of indicators of community capacity. This paper presents a summary of the research, the model and the proposed indicators. The model locates talents and skills of community members in a larger context of socioenvironmental conditions, both inside and outside the community, which can act to enable or constrain the expression of these talents and skills. The significance of the indicators of community capacity proposed in the study is that they focus on identifying and measuring the facilitating and constraining socioenvironmental conditions.
Key words: action research; community capacity; health promotion; indicators
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Smith, L. B. Littlejohns, P. Hawe, and L. Sutherland Great expectations and hard times: developing community indicators in a Healthy Communities Initiative in Canada Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2008; 23(2): 119 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Higgins, P.-J. Naylor, and M. Day Seed funding for health promotion: sowing sustainability or skepticism? Community Dev. J., April 1, 2008; 43(2): 210 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Carson, N. L. Chappell, and C. J. Knight Promoting Health and Innovative Health Promotion Practice Through a Community Arts Centre Health Promot Pract, October 1, 2007; 8(4): 366 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Raeburn, M. Akerman, K. Chuengsatiansup, F. Mejia, and O. Oladepo Community capacity building and health promotion in a globalized world Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2006; 21(suppl_1): 84 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Veazie, J. M. Galloway, D. Matson-Koffman, D. R. LaBarthe, J. N. Brownstein, M. Emr, E. Bolton, E. Freund Jr, R. Fulwood, J. Guyton-Krishnan, et al. Taking the Initiative: Implementing the American Heart Association Guide for Improving Cardiovascular Health at the Community Level: Healthy People 2010 Heart Disease and Stroke Partnership Community Guideline Implementation and Best Practices Workgroup Circulation, October 18, 2005; 112(16): 2538 - 2554. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



