Skip Navigation



Health Promotion International Advance Access published online on March 11, 2005
Health Promotion International, doi:10.1093/heapro/dah611
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/260    most recent
dah611v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VALAITIS, R.
Right arrow Articles by O'MARA, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VALAITIS, R.
Right arrow Articles by O'MARA, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Article

Enabling youth participation in school-based computer-supported community development in Canada

RUTA VALAITIS 1* and LINDA O'MARA 2

1 McMaster University School of Nursing; City of Hamilton, Public Health and Community Services Department, Public Health Research, Education and Development (PHRED) Program
2 McMaster University School of Nursing

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
RUTA VALAITIS, E-mail: valaitis{at}mcmaster.ca


  Abstract

Schools are a main setting for health promotion for youth. A qualitative case study was undertaken in an inner-city, Canadian school. It explored factors that enabled and constrained youth in the process of a school-based computer-supported community development (CD) project. Nineteen grade seven and eight students worked with four adult facilitators for 12 weeks. They completed a community assessment, planned and implemented actions to improve their school environment. Data were collected by: youth and adult interviews, participant observation, content analysis of online postings and two surveys. Constant comparison and triangulation from various data sources and methods were used to verify themes. Themes were categorized as intrinsic or extrinsic enabling and constraining factors. Intrinsic enabling factors were youth's perceptions that they were making a difference, and feeling recognized for and having ownership of their work. Extrinsic enabling factors included flexibility in youth's choice of activities, supportive adults and community members and the use of incentives. Intrinsic constraining factors were the perceived slow pace of the CD process, and difficulties in getting group consensus/decision-making. Extrinsic constraining factors included: school disruptions and schedules, a lack of ‘buy-in’ from teachers and parents, and resource demands--people and computers. Relationships between these factors are noted. Research and practice implications regarding school-based CD to promote youth resiliency are discussed.

Keywords: community development; computer; school; youth; participation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.