Skip Navigation



Health Promotion International Advance Access published online on April 3, 2006
Health Promotion International, doi:10.1093/heapro/dal009
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/2/136    most recent
dal009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WHITELAW, S.
Right arrow Articles by WIMBUSH, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WHITELAW, S.
Right arrow Articles by WIMBUSH, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

An evaluation of the Health Promoting Health Service Framework: the implementation of a settings based approach within the NHS in Scotland

SANDY WHITELAW 1 *, CLAUDIA MARTIN 2, ANN KERR 3, and ERICA WIMBUSH 3

1 Health & Social Studies, University of Glasgow in Dumfries, Crichton Campus, Bankend Road, Dumfries DG1 4ZL, UK
2 Scottish Centre for Social Research, (incorporating NatCen Scotland and Scottish Health Feedback), Scotland
3 NHS Health Scotland, Scotland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
SANDY WHITELAW, E-mail: s.whitelaw{at}crichton.gla.ac.uk


  Abstract

SUMMARY In 1996 the Health Education Board for Scotland (now NHS Health Scotland) began a process of developing a ‘settings’-based framework that would inform health promotion work across Scottish health services--the Health Promoting Health Service Framework (HPHS). It took the form of a flexible guidance document, attending to the foundations of integrated and sustainable health promotion practice via specific areas like partnership work, policy development and staff health. The project has subsequently been progressed over an extended period, comprising three phases: an initial development of the resource; piloting of the framework; and a wider assessment of implementation and initial impact. This paper reports on the latter phase. Within the context of various issues pertaining to the evaluation of a ‘settings’ approach and based on the use of case study methodology in nine HPHS pilot sites, this paper reports on the latter 2 year phase. This involved ongoing concern for understanding intervention processes and a growing interest in intervention outcomes and the paper reports on findings in each of these domains. In relation to outcomes, some positive gains in various indicators were detected though significant problems were experienced in this aspect. More significantly, the work was able to gain insights into what we call ‘necessary conditions’ of implementation. We theorize a range of ‘contextual’ factors (e.g. responsiveness to health improvement policy agendas) and project specific ‘mechanisms’ (e.g. providing skilled support) and present these as a nexus of conditions required for effective implementation of health promotion practice within explanatory models. Most significantly, we stress the relative frailty of any settings implementation strategy based simply on the uncoordinated dissemination of a tool or resource.

Keywords: health service settings; evaluation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.