Skip Navigation



Health Promotion International Advance Access published online on December 18, 2006
Health Promotion International, doi:10.1093/heapro/dal059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/65    most recent
dal059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inchley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Currie, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inchley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Currie, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Becoming a health promoting school: evaluating the process of effective implementation in Scotland

Jo Inchley, Janine Muldoon and Candace Currie

Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit (CAHRU), The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Address for correspondence: Jo Inchley, Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit, The University of Edinburgh, St Leonard's Land Holyrood Road Edinburgh EH8 8AQ Scotland, UK E-mail: Jo.Inchley{at}ed.ac.uk


  Abstract

Increasingly, researchers are exploring alternative ways of assessing the impact of ‘Health Promoting School’ (HPS) initiatives, in recognition of the model's emphasis on achieving change that is both enduring and far-reaching. However, it is still assumed that initiatives will lead to immediate change at the individual level. This paper challenges that view and argues that potential markers of success associated with process need to be identified earlier as a means of supporting schools and teachers. Notwithstanding differences in the way the HPS is conceptualized and implemented, four themes are highlighted that have relevance beyond any one school or country. These were drawn from a process evaluation of a European Network of HPSs Project in Scotland. They highlight the ways in which schools were able to successfully adopt HPS principles and the conditions that need to be in place for the HPS concept to flourish. Such indicators need to be given greater recognition as HPS outcomes if schools are to progress beyond the early stages of project implementation.

Key words: health promoting school; process evaluation; implementation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
M. Deschesnes, F. Trudeau, and M. Kebe
Factors influencing the adoption of a Health Promoting School approach in the province of Quebec, Canada
Health Educ. Res., October 19, 2009; (2009) cyp058v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
N. Yoshimura, M. Jimba, K. C. Poudel, C. Chanthavisouk, A. Iwamoto, B. Phommasack, and K. Saklokham
Health promoting schools in urban, semi-urban and rural Lao PDR
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2009; 24(2): 166 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.