<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Health Promotion International - current issue</title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Health Promotion International - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2245</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>March 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Health Promotion International</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0957-4824</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/16?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/24?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/35?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/42?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/52?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/60?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/70?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/78?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/86?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/98?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/103?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adelaide revisited: from healthy public policy to Health in All Policies]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kickbusch, I., McCann, W., Sherbon, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dan006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adelaide revisited: from healthy public policy to Health in All Policies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIAL</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in smoking among restaurant and bar employees following Norway's comprehensive smoking ban]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Norway implemented a nationwide ban on indoor smoking in June 2004. This study documents the smoking patterns of Norway's restaurant and bar workers before and after the ban, to determine changes in smoking prevalence and explore which individual and environmental characteristics were related to cessation. A national sample of food service workers was surveyed by telephone or Internet immediately before the ban and at 4 and 11 months post-implementation. Results showed that between baseline measurement and 4 months post-implementation, there were significant declines in prevalence of daily smoking (&ndash;3.6% points, p &lt; 0.005), daily smoking at work (&ndash;6.2% points, p &lt; 0.001), number of cigarettes smoked by continuing smokers (&ndash;1.55, p &lt; 0.001) and number of cigarettes smoked at work by continuing smokers (&ndash;1.63, p &lt; 0.001). No significant changes occurred in any of these variables between 4 and 11 months post-implementation. Logistic regression analysis revealed that only smokers' intentions at baseline to quit within 30 days predicted cessation at both follow-up time points. In addition, cessation at 4 months was predicted by lower daily cigarette consumption at baseline, whereas cessation at 11 months was predicted by baseline attitude toward ETS and exposure to ETS as measured at follow-up. In sum, Norway's smoking ban was accompanied by a reduction in smoking in the period immediately following the ban, and the reduction was maintained almost a year later. The finding that smoking cessation was consistently associated with smokers' intentions to quit within 30 days suggests that motivational and support programs could play a significant role in boosting cessation rates. It is recommended that targeted interventions be used to supplement the benefits of a comprehensive ban to achieve tobacco control objectives.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Braverman, M. T., Aaro, L. E., Hetland, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in smoking among restaurant and bar employees following Norway's comprehensive smoking ban]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>15</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL PAPERS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/16?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[School children as health change agents in Magu, Tanzania: a feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/16?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The feasibility of an action-oriented and participatory educational approach, where school children function as health change agents, in a rural community of (Magu district) Tanzania was explored. Observations, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with pupils, teachers and parents were undertaken. Findings showed that study participants favoured an approach where school children played an active role as health change agents in a combined school and community health education project. This conclusion contradicts traditional views in many African cultures where power, status and wisdom are usually closely associated with old age. However, a number of barriers were found, including the curriculum, time constraints, class size, teaching materials and teachers' skills and working conditions. The idea that pupils act as health change agents in the community as part of an action-oriented and participatory health education approach in schools was supported. A list of factors to consider when planning an action-oriented health education project is provided and discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mwanga, J. R., Jensen, B. B., Magnussen, P., Aagaard-Hansen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[School children as health change agents in Magu, Tanzania: a feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL PAPERS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/24?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[People and money matter: investment lessons from the Ontario heart health program, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/24?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Resource allocation is a critical issue for public health decision-makers. Yet little is known about the level and type of resources needed to build capacity to plan and implement comprehensive programs. This paper examines the relationships between investments and changes in organizational capacity and program implementation in the first phase (1998&ndash;2003) of the Ontario Heart Health Program (OHHP)&mdash;a province-wide, comprehensive public health program that involved 40 community partnerships. The study represents a subset of findings from a provincial evaluation. Investments, organizational capacity of public health units and implementation of heart health activities were measured longitudinally. Investment information was gathered annually from the provincial government, local public health units and community partners using standard reports, and was available from 1998 to 2002. Organizational capacity and program implementation were measured using a written survey, completed by all health units at five measurement times from 1994 to 2002. Combining provincial and local sources, the average total investment by year five was $1.66 per capita. Organizational capacity of public health units and implementation of heart health activities increased both before and during the first 2 years of the OHHP, and then plateaued at a modest level for capacity and a low level for implementation after that. Amount of funding was positively associated with organizational capacity, yet this association was overpowered by the negative influence of turnover of a key staff position. Regression analysis indicated that staff turnover explained 23% of local variability in organizational capacity. Findings reinforce the need for adequate investment and retention of key staff positions in complex partnership programs. Better accounting of public health investments, including monetary and in-kind investments, is needed to inform decisions about the amount and duration of public health investments that will lead to effective program implementation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riley, B. L., Edwards, N. C., d'Avernas, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[People and money matter: investment lessons from the Ontario heart health program, Canada]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>34</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL PAPERS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/35?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Australian pension funds and tobacco investments: promoting ill health and out-of-step with their members]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/35?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>There has been no systematic examination of issues surrounding pension funds and their tobacco shareholdings. This paper describes two studies designed to document the tobacco investment policies and practices of pension funds, and to assess community and fund member attitudes to pension fund shareholdings in the tobacco industry. Chief executives (n = 282) of Australian pension funds were mailed questionnaires. Of 241 eligible funds, 107 (44.4%) returned questionnaires, representing about 61% of total Australian primary superannuation accounts. Twelve percent indicated that they did not currently hold tobacco investments, 30% held tobacco shares and 58% did not know or failed to answer. Overall, 6% of respondents said that they held no tobacco investments and would not consider future investments; 2% had formal policies precluding tobacco investments. Funds with 10 000 or more members were more likely (p = 0.0006) to report tobacco investments. External fund manager advice was the most important factor influencing the funds' position. In the second study, a one-third random sub-sample of consenting subjects from 12 000 households randomly selected from the New South Wales Electronic White Pages completed phone interviews. From 7141 eligible households, 3503 (49.1%) subjects consented. One-third (n = 1158) were asked the pension fund questions. Over three-quarters (77.4%) of all respondents disagreed that pension fund investments in tobacco were ethical. Approximately two-thirds (63.6%) of fund members (n = 852) agreed that their funds should not make tobacco investments. There were three statistically significant predictors of opposition to such investments: being female, more highly educated and non-smoking status. Nearly all pension funds treat tobacco investments like any other investment. In contrast, most of the public including fund members are strongly opposed to such investments. Suggestions for public health advocacy strategies to reduce the negative health promotion effects of pension funds in this area are outlined.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walsh, R. A., Tzelepis, F., Stojanovski, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Australian pension funds and tobacco investments: promoting ill health and out-of-step with their members]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>41</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL PAPERS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/42?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding barriers and facilitators of fruit and vegetable consumption among a diverse multi-ethnic population in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/42?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A diet high in fruits and vegetables (F&amp;V) has been associated with a decreased risk of certain cancers, reduced morbidity and mortality from heart disease, and enhanced weight management. Yet to date, most of the US population does not consume the recommended amount of F&amp;V despite numerous interventions and government guidelines to promote consumption. Research has found various impediments to F&amp;V consumption, such as high costs, an obesogenic environment and low socio-economic status. However, studies have not sufficiently focused on barriers and enablers to F&amp;V intake among adult multi-ethnic populations. The present qualitative study examines 147 focus group participants' perceptions of impediments and enablers to F&amp;V consumption. Twelve focus groups were conducted among African American, Hispanic and Caucasian men and women in North Carolina and Connecticut. Focus groups were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and entered into QSR NVivo Software. Text data were systematically analyzed by investigators to identify recurrent themes both within and across groups and states. Focus group results indicate that most participants were aware of the health benefits associated with a diet rich in F&amp;V. Yet many admitted not adhering to the Health and Human Service's recommendations. Individual impediments consisted of the high costs of F&amp;V and a perceived lack of time. Early home food environment was perceived as affecting F&amp;V consumption later in life. Other barriers reported were ethnic-specific. The African American participants reported limited access to fresh produce. This finding is consistent with numerous studies and must be addressed through health promotion intervention. Both the church and primary care clinics were described by African Americans as appropriate settings for health behavior interventions; these findings should be considered. Hispanic participants, mostly immigrants, cited inhibiting factors encountered in their adopted US environment. There is a need to improve the availability and access to fresh F&amp;V commonly available in the home countries of Hispanic immigrants.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeh, M.-C., Ickes, S. B., Lowenstein, L. M., Shuval, K., Ammerman, A. S., Farris, R., Katz, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding barriers and facilitators of fruit and vegetable consumption among a diverse multi-ethnic population in the USA]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>51</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL PAPERS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/52?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using qualitative methodology to inform an Indigenous-owned oral health promotion initiative in Australia]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/52?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Indigenous Australians experience poor oral health. Oral health perceptions among a group of rural-dwelling Indigenous Australians were explored so that a culturally appropriate, community-owned oral health promotion initiative might be developed. Focus group methodology was used, with prompt questions including oral health knowledge, oral health's role in general health, how community oral health had changed in recent times, the causes of poor oral health and ways to prevent poor oral health at a community level. Some 34 participants took part; age range 21&ndash;72 years. A core category emerged from the data and was labelled &lsquo;cultural adaptation&rsquo;. Five sub-categories were also identified; &lsquo;lifestyle changes&rsquo;, &lsquo;oral health behaviours&rsquo;, &lsquo;barriers to dental care&rsquo;, &lsquo;impact of poor oral health&rsquo; and &lsquo;oral health literacy&rsquo;. Participants felt that historical legacy impacted on the oral health of community members, through continued practices of being told what to do, where to live and what oral health services were available to them. Participants perceived they had little power over their oral health or oral health care decisions. Findings from the focus group discussions were used in the development of a context-specific, oral health promotion initiative, which involved construction of an audiovisual tool in Phase I and a series of interactive, context-specific seminars focused on key issues raised in the focus groups in Phase II. Oral health promotion initiatives among rural-dwelling Indigenous Australians may be more successful if perceptions of the anticipated audience are considered in the design stage of such strategies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamieson, L. M., Parker, E. J., Richards, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using qualitative methodology to inform an Indigenous-owned oral health promotion initiative in Australia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>59</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>52</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL PAPERS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/60?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promoting health in response to global tourism expansion in Cuba]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/60?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The ability of communities to respond to the pressures of globalization is an important determinant of community health. Tourism is a rapidly growing industry and there is an increasing concern about its health impact on local communities. Nonetheless, little research has been conducted to identify potential mitigating measures. We therefore took advantage of the &lsquo;natural experiment&rsquo; provided by the expansion of tourism in Cuba, and conducted four focus groups and key informants interviews in each of two coastal communities. Participants expressed concerns about psycho-social impacts as well as occupational and environmental concerns, and both infectious and chronic diseases. A wide array of programs that had been developed to mitigate potential negative were described. Some of the programs were national in scope and others were locally developed. The programs particularly targeted youth as the most vulnerable population at risk of addictions and sexually transmitted infections. Occupational health concerns for workers in the tourism sector were also addressed, with many of the measures implemented protecting tourists as well. The health promotion and various other participatory action initiatives implemented showed a strong commitment to address the impacts of tourism and also contributed to building capacity in the two communities. Although longitudinal studies are needed to assess the sustainability of these programs and to evaluate their long-term impact in protecting health, other communities can learn from the initiatives taken.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spiegel, J. M., Gonzalez, M., Cabrera, G. J., Catasus, S., Vidal, C., Yassi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promoting health in response to global tourism expansion in Cuba]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>60</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PERSPECTIVES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/70?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relations between Internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support and subjective health]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/70?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study aimed to explore relations between Internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support and subjective health. Participants were from representative samples between 15 and 80 years of age from seven different European countries. Two different survey datasets were used: (i) eHealth trends (eHT; <I>N</I> = 7934) and (ii) the European social survey (ESS2; <I>N</I> = 11248). Internet users who had used the Internet for health purposes were compared with Internet users who had not used it for health purposes. Structural equation modelling was used to assess the relationships between SES, Internet use, social support and subjective health. Use of other media was compared to Internet use in relation to social support and subjective health. Internet use was found to be more closely related to social support and subjective health than use of other media. Internet use was also found to be a plausible mediator between SES and subjective health, especially through interacting with social support.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wangberg, S. C., Andreassen, H. K., Prokosch, H.-U., Santana, S. M. V., Sorensen, T., Chronaki, C. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relations between Internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support and subjective health]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PERSPECTIVES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/78?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Setting an ethical agenda for health promotion]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/78?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World has sparked lively dialogue. Welcomed by some as a Charter current to the times, there are others who see it as an unneeded and therefore unwelcome challenger to the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Intended or not, the Bangkok Charter seems to signal a shift in discourse, from a social-ecological approach and an emphasis on individual and community capacity-building and empowerment, to an investment approach and an emphasis on globalization, macro-level factors and policy. Positively, the Bangkok Charter proclaims to build on Ottawa, and no one suggests it is meant to replace the Ottawa Charter outright. In concert with that, the dialogue today is not so much about the ascendancy of the one Charter over the other, but about the degree to which the Bangkok Charter remains true to the ethic of the Ottawa Charter. It is welcome that the Ottawa and Bangkok Charters are the subject of brisk dialogue about strategy and tactics in a rapidly changing world, and about the foundational values of health promotion. Regarding the latter, we have unfinished work in constructing an ethic for health promotion, and the present dialogue may inspire us to progress. Though we have the cornerstone of an ethic for health promotion, in the Ottawa Charter and in other principled documents that have followed, we have yet to build sufficiently on the cornerstone; an ethic for practice has yet to be codified, and the same is true for research. Health promotion journals, conferences and organizations can and should do more to facilitate dialogue on ethics in health promotion, and the Internet provides the means for all to participate actively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mittelmark, M. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Setting an ethical agenda for health promotion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>85</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DEBATE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/86?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modelling the results of health promotion activities in Switzerland: development of the Swiss Model for Outcome Classification in Health Promotion and Prevention]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/86?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper describes the Model for Outcome Classification in Health Promotion and Prevention adopted by Health Promotion Switzerland (SMOC, Swiss Model for Outcome Classification) and the process of its development. The context and method of model development, and the aim and objectives of the model are outlined. Preliminary experience with application of the model in evaluation planning and situation analysis is reported. On the basis of an extensive literature search, the model is situated within the wider international context of similar efforts to meet the challenge of developing tools to assess systematically the activities of health promotion and prevention.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spencer, B., Broesskamp-Stone, U., Ruckstuhl, B., Ackermann, G., Spoerri, A., Cloetta, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modelling the results of health promotion activities in Switzerland: development of the Swiss Model for Outcome Classification in Health Promotion and Prevention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>DEBATE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/98?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Shaping the future of health promotion: priorities for action]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/98?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The International Union for Health Promotion and Education, in collaboration with the Canadian Consortium for Health Promotion Research, and with support from the Public Health Agency of Canada, have formulated recommendations on priorities for action regarding the policies and system conditions necessary for sustainable and effective health promotion. The statement, launched in June in Vancouver at the IUHPE World Conference on Health Promotion and Health Education, and reproduced below, is the product of an international Project Advisory Group's reflections derived from a collection of commissioned field reports on renewing commitment to the path set out by the Ottawa Charter. The field reports themselves will be published in their entirety in a special issue of &lsquo;Promotion &amp; Education&rsquo;, official journal of the International Union for Health Promotion and Education, in December 2007.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dam033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Shaping the future of health promotion: priorities for action]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>STATEMENTS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health Promotion International]]></title>
<link>http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/23/1/103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapro/dan007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health Promotion International]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>23</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>LIST OF REFEREES</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>